Best heatsink material? Copper vs. Aluminum vs. Ceramic
I've been doing some research lately regarding heatsinks for SBCs, like Raspberry Pi. I couldn't find any comprehensive comparisons between copper, aluminum, and ceramic so I decided to do my own testing:
Heatsinks:
- Copper
- Aluminum
- Ceramic
Adhesive:
- 3M double-sided thermal tape (on flayed aluminum): 0.8 W/mK thermal conductivity
- SYY 157 thermal paste: 15.7 W/mK thermal conductivity
- Kritical thermal pad (0.5mm): 20 W/mK thermal conductivity
- LT-100 liquid metal: 128 W/mK thermal conductivity
Fan: Pi-Fan (GF3007BS)
Test SBC: NanoPi NEO3 (Rockchip RK3328 CPU)
Stress Test: CPU crypto mining
Results: link
P.S. You can hold the heatsink and thermal pad in place by applying a small amount of thermal glue around the perimeter.
Conclusions:
- Ceramic was okay, but not exceptional
- Liquid metal isn't worth the hassle/risk (thermal paste was within a couple degrees and the thermal pad was actually better)
- Aluminum beating copper was a surprise (size appears to have a bigger effect than material)
- Active is better than passive cooling (in some cases passive cooling was no better than the bare chip)
- If you need a thicker thermal substance than 2.5 mm, go with Thermal Putty CX-H1300 (13.5 W/mK)
Comments
Post a Comment
Keep it clean and professional...